
"Houston. Tranquility Base here. The Eagle has
landed." I still get goosebumps when I hear that. Do you?
Thirty years ago this week we were glued to our TVs as two Americans walked on the moon
and one more orbited above. Apollo 11 on the moon. What greater showcase for American
technology and scientific achievement than that event?
Remember when many of our heroes were scientists
.not tall guys who can dunk a
basketball? Remember how proud we were of American scientific achievement and our American
heroes of science?
I know you will agree that science and math education is critically important to our
future as a state and a nation. It is critically important to my company as well. So I am
delighted to have this opportunity to talk about some of the perspectives of business this
vital area of science education.
First, I need to congratulate you for the outstanding work of the regional collaboratives
and for all of your great successes so far.
Congratulations to Kamil Jbeily and his staff and to each of the directors of the
collaboratives. Your work is critical to Texas future.
Kamil is passionate about what he does. And so are you. Kamil has even offered to help me
overcome my lifelong aversion to Chemistry with some Saturday morning tutoring.
Southwestern Bells partnership with the Regional Collaboratives over the past three
years has been rewarding to us, and, as you say in your values statements, you reward your
partners. We feel that is the case. So I am delighted to be here.
My remarks today concern the business perspective on science education in Texas.
Scientists and mathematicians use formulas to solve problems. So let me try to outline a
formula -- from the view of at least one Texas corporation that will get us where
we need to be.
Southwestern Bell considers math and science education an integral part of our own
particular role in education in Texas. We have recently updated our strategic plan for
education in Texas. Science and math support continues to be one of a handful of specific
focus areas for us.
For example, for years we have supported programs such as MATHCOUNTS and the Texas
Association of Minorities in Engineering.
One of our corporate officers serves on the Governors Science and Technology Council
and in support of that councils agenda, this fall we will be underwriting a
professional development program for teachers of Advanced Placement courses, particularly
in math and science.
There are a few more Southwestern Bell projects dealing with science that I will mention
in a moment.
But to be honest we recognize there is a lot more Southwestern Bell can do in this area.
And a lot more that the Texas business community can do. With your help, we will try.
It is only natural that we at Southwestern Bell take this interest in what you are doing.
Ours is a technologically driven company
.in a very competitive industry. We need
employees who are well-grounded in science and math. Our customers are much more
technologically savvy today than ever before.
Our jobs are more complex. Our services are more complex. It takes a whole lot of science
to provide advanced telecommunications services
.to move 200 million bits of
information in one second over a fiber-optic circuit from its source to its
destination
intact.
Southwestern Bell, and our parent company, SBC Communications, are major employers in
this state. In total, we employ more than 37,000 people in Texas. We have added about
11,000 people in the past five years alone, and we expect to need thousands more in the
next decade.
What kinds of jobs do we offer? Many of them are very high- tech jobs in fields like the
installation and maintenance of fiber optic transmission systems and digital switching
systems. Even a position like customer service representative is a job that today requires
computer skills and other technical knowledge.
Some of our jobs are extremely technical. For example, the network installation and
maintenance technician, an entry-level job, requires a very thorough set of knowledge and
skills. These employees must be adept at reading and interpreting technical manuals,
schematics, blueprints and diagrams. They must have thorough understanding of electrical
circuits. And to go farther and advance to the job title of communications technician, our
employees must be able to use algebraic and digital logic to solve electronic problems.
If a job applicant comes to us with a solid high school preparation or a community college
degree, we can and will provide the advanced training necessary to make that person
successful on the job.
But if applicants come to us without those basic skills in science and math, without a
familiarity with scientific concepts, and without the problem-solving skills that come
with a knowledge of scientific method, they are not likely to make it through our
selection process -- and we then simply have to turn them away.And today, for the majority
of applicants, that is exactly what we have to do: turn them away.
Our internal job training program at Southwestern Bell cannot possibly replace the
basic skills taught all the way back in elementary school in math and science and language
arts.
It used to be that a person who wanted a good job went down to the phone company and if
there were openings, competed with others in that town for the jobs. Now our job
applicants compete with others from across the nation even around the world
for our jobs.
And we took care of the training. But that is not the case anymore.
So Southwestern Bell looks at this whole area of science education knowing full well that
there is a great deal at stake for us.
I dont think that all Texas businesses have the same perspectives we do on the
most important issues and the most effective ways to raise scientific literacy among Texas
students -- but here are some thoughts on that from at least one corporation: Southwestern
Bell.
First, accountability is king. The Texas accountability system, with the TAAS test
underlying it, has produced significant success for our state .and accountability will
help move science education forward.
Im sure you are aware that in the last legislative session, there was a concerted
effort backed by businesses to enhance the TAAS testing system. At one
point, SB 103 would have included a science test at the fifth, seventh and 10th
grades as well as in a new exit test in the 11th grade.
Many of you in this room were part of the lobbying effort for SB103. We didnt get
everything we wanted, but we can take heart in the new 5th grade TAAS science
test and the fact that the 10th and 11th grade tests will include
science.
We all know that what gets tested, gets taught. And the stakes for schools and school
districts in teaching science will be very high stakes indeed. Technology-based companies
like mine are glad to see this and proud of the fact that we supported these changes at
the legislature.
So, in creating our formula for success, we start with accountability.
Second, lets add in the issue of teacher shortages in science education a
huge issue that must be addressed by all of us collectively.
It is hard to overstate the magnitude of this problem. A few months ago, the Texas Center
for Educational Research published a study on the teacher shortage in Texas --- as study
in collaboration with the TEA, the Higher Ed Coordinating Board, SBEC, and Region 20 ESC.
If you havent seen that report, I commend it to you.
In 1998, out of 686,000 students taking science in the 7th and 8th
grades in Texas, 23 percent of them were taught by individuals not certified to teach
science. In the 9th through 12 grades, 16 percent of 920,000 students were
taught science courses by teachers not certified in those subjects. The statistics for
math are very similar.
Looking at this another way: In 7th and 8th grade math classrooms in
Texas last year, almost one out of three teachers were not certified to teach that
particular level of math. For science at the 7th and 8th grades,
about one out of four teachers were not certified at that level.
Not only are we not recruiting and preparing enough new science teachers, our teacher
retention statistics are troubling, too. For science teachers in Texas, the average number
of years in the classroom is about four for beginning Chemistry --- and a bit better for
Physics and Biology.
This shortage is not new to you, but my point is that the business community is just now
getting focused on this. We have been not nearly engaged enough in dealing with
this
.and we should be. The problem has to be attacked on several levels.
The TCER study recommends a few ways:
(1) On the recruiting side, we must work harder on creating financial incentives.
Things like scholarships. Loan forgiveness. The new TEXAS grants program, which is modeled
along the lines of the Hope Scholarships in Georgia, will provide millions in grants to
students who plan to teach in critical shortage areas -- shortage areas defined by
academic discipline and by geography. The Higher Ed Coordinating Board is writing rules
for these grants right now.
Innovative recruiting efforts must be pursued
. like the program at UT-Austin where
students enrolled in the College of Natural Sciences are recruited early in their college
careers and given opportunity to teach science classes in Austin elementary schools
and inspiring many of them to teach science when they graduate.
(2) Also on the recruiting side, there are some interesting efforts to communicate job
openings to potential teachers using technology. The SBEC Information and Support Center
is certainly a step in the right direction. Also, Region 13 ESC has a resume-screening
service that districts in that region can use to publicize teaching jobs and allow
prospective teachers to submit their resumes
.electronically.
(3) Alternative certification is growing bigger, with 27 institutions now offering
approved alternative certification programs in Texas. Thats very good news. The
Troops to Teachers kind of program has great potential.
(4) On the teacher retention side, all indications are that teachers need more and
better training and support early in their careers.
You are certainly quite aware of that, but the research Ive seen shows that the
lack of support in early teaching years is the biggest factor even above pay and
benefits in teachers leaving the classroom.
To all those kinds of initiatives in filling the certified teacher shortage, I would
add a couple more:
First, the use of distance learning technologies to bring certified teachers to students
electronically. We are not doing enough with this. In Texas we are fortunate to have the
Telecommunications Infrastructure Fund
the TIF. Since 1995, the TIF has been provided
$150 million per year, most of it available to K-12 schools for technology
and the
TIF will exist for 10 years, or a total of $1.5 billion. The assessment to the TIF from
Southwestern Bell alone is $45 million per year. It is time for TIF to begin using for
distance learning programs rather than just classroom connectivity, and that is just what
TIF is going to do.
Second, there is a need for statewide leadership and coordination of efforts in
addressing this dilemma. Like almost everything else in education in Texas, at least from
our viewpoint in the private sector, the decentralized authority structure and the
fragmented array of programs and initiatives is frustrating. It must be more frustrating
you than it is for us.
But there is no clear lead entity grappling with -- or better yet, accountable for --
the issue of teacher shortages. Its everybodys problem and nobodys at
the same time. At this conference, you have discussed scholarship funding, incentive pay
and a host of other remedies. I believe it is time now for business and the science
education community to sit down together and formulate a legislative agenda for the 2001
session to deal with reducing the teacher shortage.
Moving beyond the teacher shortage issue, lets talk about professional
development. In many ways, high quality professional development of science teachers is
the lynch-pin to everything. Thats where the Regional Collaboratives come in. And
why you are so important.
From a business perspective, training and continuous improvement is not an option. It
is a reality that must be faced and financed.
One more key issue I want to discuss finally. As you have heard throughout this
conference, much greater public attention must be drawn to this issue. Parents need to
understand the role of science education in preparing their children for the future. The
public needs to feel the same urgency.
In a state like Texas where computers, telecommunications, and other high-tech jobs are
becoming the foundation of our economy, only 44,000 of more than 700,000 10th ,
11th and 12th graders completed a Physics course in 1997. Only
123,000 completed a Chemistry course. Again, thats out of 700,000 students.
We have to tell the story more powerfully to parents and students. One of the bright
lights in this is the Texas Scholars program, which has been organized and advocated by
the Texas Business and Education Coalition. To encourage students to take the Recommended
High School Program, eighth graders hear the message about course selection and future
earnings potential and how they are tied together. Parents get the message, too.
Science courses are not just for kids who want to become scientists or engineers, but for
everybody.
Having said all this, what is a formula for success?
Let me try this one:
Accountability and testing
plus teachers multiplied by professional development
plus public awareness
all to the power of teamwork (the exponent)
equals success for Texas students in science.
As they say, solve for X.
So what is the role of business in solving for X?
First, businesses can educate and motivate their own employees. Example: offering
employees information on alternative certification. Southwestern Bell in Texas will be
doing that again this year.
Business can take a stand on the policy issues involved.
We can be an advocate in the political arena. This is exactly what TBEC
is all about. And the SB 103 legislation is a great example of this, where TBEC informed
businesses about the bill and organized business support for it.
Business is often asked to underwrite projects and programs. That has its place where
the monies can truly can be leveraged to make a significant impact. Yet private sector
contributions dollars are not a panacea and we cant think of them that way.
But, done right, they can support strategic programs and can be powerful.
Business can and should help bring public attention to the issue, particularly with
parents. A Southwestern Bell example: "Parents as School Partners in Math and
Science." Let me describe this a bit. We offer grants of $2000 for programs that
involve parents in dealing with the math and science student achievement issues at the
campus level. We have put aside $100,000 for these grants this year, and we are now
looking at more than 150 applications.
Finally, business can participate in your professional development efforts, bringing
our real-world applications to your classrooms. I now you are doing this already in the
Regional Collaboratives. We should do more of it.
Before I conclude, let me talk a bit about working with business partners, especially
the large corporate types. You have heard these kinds of things before, I am sure, but
they are really important to mention here today.
When you approach businesses as partners, tell us about the results you want to obtain
and how success is to be measured. We are (often obsessively) concerned about results, not
about process.
Dont assume we know what you are talking about. Spell things out.
Explain how your successful pilot program really will be expanded and replicated.
Replication is often a weak spot, and it concerns us.
Look for the unique interests of the business from which you are seeking funding.
Before you propose your specific project, learn about what our "hot-buttons"
are.
And finally, reward your partners. Your contributors. This is certainly the case with
the Regional Collaboratives.
I talked earlier about heroes in science and how important they are. Let me tell you
about mine.
In my freshman year in college I took Astronomy. It was taught by none other than Clyde
W. Tombaugh, the discoverer of planet Pluto in 1930. When he described his tedious search
for a possible new planet, he was inspiring. He talked about comparing thousands of photo
images of stars, looking for any evidence of another planet. And we he found it, he was
bursting with excitement. Clyde Tombaugh captured the sense of wonder that drives science.
He was a hero of science.
Thank you for how you have embraced us at Southwestern Bell. Thank you for what you are
doing for the students of Texas.
And thank you for your time and attention today.
<up> <back>

|